Bioretention systems are efficient at removing particulates, metals, and hydrocarbons from stormwater runoff. However, managing dissolved nitrogen (N) species (dissolved organic N, NH4+, NO2-, NO3-) is a challenge for these systems. This paper reports the results of a long-term field study comparing N removal of: 1) a modified bioretention system that included an internal water storage zone containing wood chips to promote denitrification and 2) a conventional bioretention system. The systems were studied, without and with plants, under varying hydraulic loading rates (HLRs) and antecedent dry conditions (ADCs). Both bioretention designs were efficient at removing NH4+ (83% modified, 74% conventional), while removal of NOx (NO2--N + NO3--N) was significantly higher in the modified system (81% modified, 29% conventional). Results show that the addition of an internal water storage zone promotes denitrification, resulting in lower effluent TN concentrations (<0.75 mg/L modified, ∼1.60 mg/L conventional). The lowest HLR studied, 4.1 cm/h, provided the longest hydraulic retention time in the internal water storage zone (∼3 h) and had the greatest TN removal efficiency (90% modified, 59% conventional). In contrast to prior short-term studies, ADCs between 0 and 13 days did not significantly affect DOC export or TN removal. A short-term study with Florida friendly vegetation indicated that TN removal performance was enhanced in the conventional bioretention system. This field study provides promising results for improving dissolved N removal by modifying bioretention systems to include an internal water storage zone containing wood chips.
Keywords: Biological nutrient removal; Green stormwater infrastructure; Low impact development; Nitrogen; Stormwater BMP; Urbanization.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.