An Experimental Investigation of the Perceived Credibility of Complainants of Sexual Revictimization: Disbelief and Victim-Blame

Violence Vict. 2019 Dec 1;34(6):992-1010. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-13-00055.

Abstract

This study investigated whether attitudes toward a complainant of sexual assault are affected by the knowledge that the complainant had previously made a similar allegation. This was a 3 (previous allegation; none, child sexual assault or adult sexual assault) × 2 (whether the previous allegation was substantiated) × 2 (the implied mental health status of the complainant; mental health issue vs. none) multifactorial, experimental study, employing independent-measures and hypothetical vignettes depicting stranger rape scenarios. The dependent variables were victim-blame and believability. The participants were 243 female undergraduate students. A multivariate analyses of variance (MANOVA) revealed several main and interactive effects. Allegations of sexual revictimization were associated with different levels of victim-blame and believability depending on when the previous assault occurred. A history of childhood sexual assault reduced the believability of the complainant and when combined with other factors increased the tendency to attribute victim-blame.

Keywords: child sexual assault; false allegation; rape complainant; sexual revictimization; victim-blame.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Crime Victims / psychology*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Self-Assessment*
  • Sex Offenses / psychology*
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Truth Disclosure*
  • Young Adult