Molecular detection of biological agents in the field has traditionally relied on the use of quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR), which now includes commercially available instruments that can be used in the laboratory or field. Adapting this technology for field-forward applications necessitated innovation to minimize size, weight, and power requirements. Rugged, portable instruments, efficient power sources, freeze-dried reagents, data communications, and standard operating procedures for minimally trained users are some examples of limitations that have been overcome to allow qPCR-based data to be generated at the point of need. Despite the high specificity and sensitivity of qPCR, the assays require a priori sequence-based knowledge of the etiological agent to design and produce specific targeted assays with primers and probes. However, in many cases the etiological agent may not be known and pathogen identification must rely on the use of an untargeted screening method. By extracting, preparing, and sequencing all of the genomic material in a particular sample at once, known as metagenomics, a less biased view of the biological entities in that sample can be ascertained. Using metagenomics methods in the field requires the development and optimization of straightforward sample preparation, sequencing, and bioinformatics workflows reminiscent of the challenges faced during the development of field-forward qPCR 15 years ago. To review the state of qPCR and sequencing in the field, we summarized a panel discussion from the 2019 ASM Biothreats Conference. Our discussion focused on the development, evolution, and comparison of molecular methods for biological agents and their utility in the field.
Keywords: detection; diagnostics; field laboratory; genomic sequencing; real-time PCR.