Is Karenia brevis really a low-light-adapted species?

Charles L Tilney; Sugandha Shankar; Katherine A Hubbard; Alina A Corcoran

doi:10.1016/j.hal.2019.101709

Is Karenia brevis really a low-light-adapted species?

Harmful Algae. 2019 Dec:90:101709. doi: 10.1016/j.hal.2019.101709. Epub 2019 Nov 25.

Authors

Charles L Tilney¹, Sugandha Shankar², Katherine A Hubbard², Alina A Corcoran²

Affiliations

¹ Fish and Wildlife Research Institute, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, St. Petersburg, FL, 33701, USA. Electronic address: charles.tilney@myfwc.com.
² Fish and Wildlife Research Institute, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, St. Petersburg, FL, 33701, USA.

PMID: 31806165
DOI: 10.1016/j.hal.2019.101709

Abstract

Despite nearly annual blooms of the neurotoxic dinoflagellate Karenia brevis (Davis) G. Hansen and Moestrup in the Gulf of Mexico, defining the suite of biological traits that explain its proliferation has remained challenging. Studies have described K. brevis as a low-light-adapted species, incapable of sustaining growth under high light, which is at odds with observed surface aggregations sometimes within centimeters of the sea surface and also with short-term experiments showing photosynthetic machinery accommodating high irradiances. Here, growth and photophysiology of three K. brevis isolates were evaluated under a range of environmentally relevant irradiances (10-1500 μmol photons m^-2 s^-1) in the laboratory. No differences in growth-irradiance curves were observed among isolates; all sustained maximum growth rates at the highest irradiances examined, even in exposures as long as three weeks. The growth efficiency α of K. brevis under light-limiting conditions appeared mediocre among dinoflagellates, and poorer than that of other phytoplankton (e.g., diatoms, cyanobacteria), implying that K. brevis is not a low-light specialist. This finding substantially alters earlier parameterizations of K. brevis growth-irradiance curves. Therefore, a model was developed to contextualize how these new growth-irradiance curves might affect bottom growth rates. This model was subsequently applied to a case study comparing seasonal light forcing offshore of Pinellas County, FL, USA, with a single empirical value for light attenuation, and seasonal bottom water temperatures. Predictions suggested that light may limit bottom growth as close as 1 km from shore in winter, but would only begin limiting growth 20 km from shore in summer. Population maintenance (no net growth) was possible as far offshore as 90 km in summer and 68 km in winter. These ranges intercept areas thought to be important for bloom initiation.

Keywords: Compensation irradiance; F(v)/F(m); Growth–irradiance curves; Modeling; Photophysiology.

Publication types

Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

Dinoflagellida*
Florida
Gulf of Mexico
Phytoplankton
Temperature