Differences in osteogenic induction of human mesenchymal stem cells between a tailored 3D hybrid scaffold and a 2D standard culture

J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2019 Dec 4;30(12):136. doi: 10.1007/s10856-019-6346-3.

Abstract

Many medical-related scientific discoveries arise from trial-error patterns where the processes involved must be refined and modified continuously before any product could be able to reach the final costumers. One of the elements affecting negatively these processes is the inaccuracy of two-dimension (2D) standard culture systems, carried over in plastic plates or similar, in replicating complex environments and patterns. Consequently, animal tests are required to validate every in vitro finding, at the expenses of more funds and ethical issues. A possible solution relies in the implementation of three-dimension (3D) culture systems as a fitting gear between the 2D tests and in vivo tests, aiming to reduce the negative in vivo outcomes. These 3D structures are depending from the comprehension of the extracellular matrix (ECM) and the ability to replicate it in vitro. In this article a comparison of efficacies between these two culture systems was taken as subject, human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) was utilized and a hybrid scaffold made by a blend of chitosan, gelatin and biomineralized gelatin was used for the 3D culture system.

MeSH terms

  • Biocompatible Materials
  • Cell Culture Techniques*
  • Cell Differentiation
  • Humans
  • Materials Testing
  • Mesenchymal Stem Cells / physiology*
  • Osteogenesis / physiology*
  • Tissue Scaffolds*

Substances

  • Biocompatible Materials