How to increase the accuracy of the diagnosis of the accessory bone of the foot?

Radiol Med. 2020 Feb;125(2):188-196. doi: 10.1007/s11547-019-01104-x. Epub 2019 Nov 23.

Abstract

Purpose: The study was conducted to search for confident radiological signs in symptomatic cases of accessory bones. A normal accessory bone appearance on X-ray does not exclude that the accessory bone is the source of the discomfort; because of this, MRI examination can later be applied as part of the diagnosis.

Methods: We retrospectively analysed cases of 64 patients with recognized 70 symptomatic accessory bones of the foot. The average age was 29.2 (range 8-42) years. We included only patients with X-ray and MRI examinations. We investigated the following radiological features of the bone (structural and signal) in relation to soft tissue.

Results: The most constant symptoms identified in our study were bone marrow oedema (93%) and soft tissue oedema (77%). Changes in structures in which accessory bones were located or in adjacent structures to accessory bone were identified: tendon changes 51%, fluid adjacent to bone 51% and tenosynovitis 46%. MRI revealed changes in bone structure that are not seen on X-ray, including changes in contour (28%), sclerosis (3%) or osteonecrosis (3%).

Conclusions: MRI plays an important role in determining whether accessory bones cause symptoms because it shows specific and accurate changes in accessory bone and/or in adjacent soft tissue.

Keywords: Bone marrow oedema; MRI bone; MRI foot; Painful accessory bone; Symptomatic accessory bone.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Bone Marrow Diseases / diagnostic imaging
  • Child
  • Female
  • Foot Bones / abnormalities*
  • Foot Bones / diagnostic imaging*
  • Foot Deformities, Congenital / diagnostic imaging*
  • Humans
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging / methods*
  • Male
  • Retrospective Studies