Direct oral anticoagulants uptake and an oral anticoagulation paradox

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Feb;86(2):392-397. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14171. Epub 2020 Jan 16.

Abstract

Oral anticoagulation (OAC) for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation is underutilised. One of the impediments to warfarin therapy is the frequent monitoring required, usually at a specialised warfarin clinic. The advent of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) facilitates OAC therapy without an onerous monitoring regimen. This benefit may result in the more significant adoption of DOACs in areas without a warfarin clinic. This study analysed national administrative data for reimbursed pharmacy claims to assess OAC prescribing from 2010 to 2017 and compared the use of DOACs in areas with warfarin clinics compared to those without. Over the study period, the number of patients on OAC increased by 84%, due to a rapid increase in DOAC prescribing. The findings demonstrate that DOACs have resulted in an increase in the overall uptake of OAC therapy in Ireland. However, the increased utilisation was not evidently related to populations underserved by warfarin clinics.

Keywords: anticoagulation; atrial fibrillation; direct oral anticoagulant; novel oral anticoagulant; warfarin.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Administration, Oral
  • Anticoagulants / therapeutic use
  • Atrial Fibrillation* / complications
  • Atrial Fibrillation* / drug therapy
  • Humans
  • Ireland / epidemiology
  • Stroke* / drug therapy
  • Stroke* / prevention & control
  • Warfarin / adverse effects

Substances

  • Anticoagulants
  • Warfarin