Over-coverage in population registers leads to bias in demographic estimates

Popul Stud (Camb). 2020 Nov;74(3):451-469. doi: 10.1080/00324728.2019.1683219. Epub 2019 Nov 14.

Abstract

Estimating the number of individuals living in a country is an essential task for demographers. This study assesses the potential bias in estimating the size of different migrant populations due to over-coverage in population registers. Over-coverage-individuals registered but not living in a country-is an increasingly pressing phenomenon; however, there is no common understanding of how to deal with over-coverage in demographic research. This study examines different approaches to and improvements in over-coverage estimation using Swedish total population register data. We assess over-coverage levels across migrant groups, test how estimates of age-specific death and fertility rates are affected when adjusting for over-coverage, and examine whether over-coverage can explain part of the healthy migrant paradox. Our results confirm the existence of over-coverage and we find substantial changes in mortality and fertility rates, when adjusted, for people of migrating age. Accounting for over-coverage is particularly important for correctly estimating migrant fertility.

Keywords: Sweden; fertility; foreign-born; healthy migrant paradox; mortality; over-coverage; population estimates; register bias; register-based.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Bias*
  • Birth Rate
  • Demography*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Mortality
  • Registries*
  • Sweden
  • Transients and Migrants* / statistics & numerical data
  • Young Adult