Objectives This paper describes the development, implementation and preliminary results of a collaborative pilot project aimed at reducing the time hospital-based patients with cognitive impairments spend waiting for the allocation of legally appointed Advocate Guardian decision makers from the Office of the Public Advocate (OPA). The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of increased availability of public advocate guardians on guardian allocation waits, patient discharge outcomes and healthcare system demand. Methods A multi-institutional pilot program created a dedicated hospital guardian team within OPA, funded by the health networks, to reduce the time to guardian allocation for patients within each network. A multisite, quasi-experimental historical control group design was used, with initial data collection over 12 months, followed by study of 12-month post-implementation cohorts. Results Under the pilot program, the time from guardianship order lodgement to guardian allocation decreased significantly from 46.5 to 22.9 days, halving the average time hospital-based patients spend waiting for a guardian (difference -23.55 days, two-sample t(154) = -6.575, P < 0.0001, 95% confidence interval [-30.65, -16.48].). Mean total length of stay decreased from 163.2 to 148.5 days. The estimated value of the reduction in allocation wait time was A$15473 per patient, or A$5 of resources released per A$1 spent on increased staffing. Conclusions Direction of a small amount of resources from health services to staff within OPA appears to have created much greater savings for the health services involved. The pilot program has reduced the period of time vulnerable patients spend waiting in hospital for a guardian. What is known about the topic? Guardianship resources are under increasing stress, with demand outstripping funding and hospital-based applicants deprioritised due to assumptions of lower risk, leading to extensive wait times for guardian allocation. What does this paper add? The paper quantifies the impact of greater guardianship resourcing on access to both guardianship and healthcare resources, highlighting benefits for vulnerable patient groups, healthcare system sustainability and access to both guardianship and healthcare resources for the broader community. What are the implications for clinicians? Improving patient flow through healthcare systems may involve allocating resources to services that are managed outside the healthcare system where 'bottlenecks', such as wait times for guardian allocation, have been identified.