Trehalose or Sucrose: Which of the Two Should be Used for Stabilizing Proteins in the Solid State? A Dilemma Investigated by In Situ Micro-Raman and Dielectric Relaxation Spectroscopies During and After Freeze-Drying

Abstract

The bioprotective properties of 2 disaccharides (sucrose and trehalose) were analyzed during the freeze-drying (FD) process and at the end of the process, to better understand the stabilization mechanisms of proteins in the solid state. In situ Raman investigations, performed during the FD process, have revealed that sucrose was more efficient than trehalose for preserving the secondary structure of lysozyme during FD, especially during the primary drying stage. The lower bioprotective effect of trehalose was interpreted as a consequence of a stronger affinity of this disaccharide to water, responsible for a severe phase separation phenomenon during the freezing stage. Dielectric spectroscopy investigations on the freeze-dried state of protein formulations have shown the capabilities of trehalose assisted by residual water to reduce the molecular mobility of the vitreous matrix, suggesting that trehalose is more efficient to preserve the protein structure during long-term storage.

Keywords: bioprotection; disaccharide; freeze-drying; in situ Raman imaging; lysozyme; molecular mobility; protein dynamics.