Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare the colonization rates of central venous catheter (CVC) and arterial catheter (ArtC) hubs fitted with two types of needleless connectors (NCs).
Methods: We designed a prospective randomized study to compare rates of catheter hub colonization of CVC and ArtC hubs fitted with two types of needleless connectors: neutral-pressure NCs (NP-NCs) and positive-pressure NCs (PP-NCs) in critically ill patients. All NCs were replaced every 7 days of use.
Results: We obtained 326 cultures from 146 catheters (81 CVC and 65 ArtC) in 70 patients. The total cumulative days of risk were 1250 catheter-days. Global swab cultures were positive in NP-NCs in 29/198 (14.6%) versus 17/128 (13.3%) in PP-NCs during catheter use. We did not observe any cases of CRBSI.
Conclusions: In our experience, the use of PP-NCs did not result in significantly more frequent hub colonization with respect to NP-NCs.
Keywords: Catheter colonization; Catheter infection; Colonización de la conexión; Colonización del catéter; Conector sin aguja; Hub colonization; Infección del catéter; Infección nosocomial; Needleless connector; Nosocomial infection; Profilaxis; Prophylaxis.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier España, S.L.U. and Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica. All rights reserved.