Validity and Responsiveness of the Work Functioning Impairment Scale in Workers With Depression

J Occup Environ Med. 2019 Dec;61(12):e523-e527. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001753.

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to evaluate the convergent validity and responsiveness of the work functioning impairment scale (WFun) in patients with depression, a major disease causing presenteeism.

Methods: Baseline testing was performed using WFun, the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS), 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) in 37 outpatients with major depression or bipolar disorder who were working. The QIDS and WFun scores were measured several times for responsiveness evaluation.

Results: Regression analyses showed significant positive correlations between baseline WFun and HAM-D and MADRS scores. Changes in WFun and QIDS scores were positively correlated for QIDS scores.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that WFun is convergently valid and responsive for determining the clinical severity of depression in workers treated as psychiatric outpatients.

Publication types

  • Validation Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Depression*
  • Employment / psychology*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Occupational Health
  • Patient Reported Outcome Measures
  • Presenteeism
  • Psychiatric Status Rating Scales / standards*
  • Psychometrics
  • Regression Analysis
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Young Adult