An extensive evaluation of low-cost dust sensors was performed using an exponentially decaying particle concentration. A total of 264 sensors including 27 sensors with light-emitting diodes (LEDs) and 237 sensors with laser lighting sources were tested. Those tested sensors were classified into 4 groups based on the deviation from the reference data obtained by a reference instrument. The response linearities of all the tested samples for PM1 , PM2.5 , and PM10 were in excellent agreement with the reference instrument, except a few samples. For the measurements of PM1 and PM2.5 , the lighting source, that is, LED or laser, did not show any significant difference in overall sensor performance. However, LED-based sensors did not perform well for PM10 measurements. The 32, 24, and 16% of all the tested sensors for PM1 , PM2.5 , and PM10 measurement, respectively, are in the category of Class 1 (reference instrument reading ± 20%) requirement. The performance of the low-cost dust sensors for PM10 measurement was relatively less satisfactory.
Keywords: embedded type sensor; exponentially decaying particle concentration; lighting source; low-cost dust sensor; module type sensor; standalone type sensor.
© 2019 The Authors. Indoor Air published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.