Safety and Security in International Humanitarian Missions - Assessing the Stress Level of Responders in Critical Situations during a Realistic Full-Scale Training

Prehosp Disaster Med. 2019 Dec;34(6):575-579. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X19005016. Epub 2019 Oct 21.

Abstract

Introduction: Crises, wars, and disasters are remarkably increasing across the world. Responders are frequently tackled with an ever-greater number of challenges, and undoubtedly, they are physically and mentally affected during and after their missions, during which posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is considered high-risk. To the authors' knowledge, no studies have addressed which type of incident has the greatest influence to trigger stress, and consequently, to cause PTSD for the responders after their missions.

Methods: A prospective longitudinal study was conducted with 69 participants of the "Safety and Security" course at the Federal Office for Civil Protection and Disaster Aid of the Federal Ministry of Interior Affairs (Berlin, Germany). The course is certified by the Hostile Environment Awareness Training (HEAT) guidelines of Europe's New Training Initiative for Civilian Crisis Management (ENTRi; Center for International Peace Operations; Berlin, Germany). Four incidents were evaluated: hostage-taking, carjacking, evacuation, and border-crossing. The participants completed the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) before and after each incident. For each incident, the delta of the PANAS scores was calculated. The differences between the described incidents, as well as the differences between novice and experienced responders, were evaluated.

Results: The hostage-taking incident had the greatest influence on the participants' temper, followed by carjacking and evacuation. Ultimately, the border-crossing event had the least effect on the responders. Novices were more affected by hostage-taking than experienced responders; however, no significant difference had been demonstrated between novices and experienced responders for the other evaluated incidents.

Conclusion: Different incidents have big psychological impacts on humanitarian responders, in which consequences vary from short-term effects to PTSD. Therefore, humanitarian responders should be selected very carefully. They should also have more specific preparation for their missions. Mental after-care should be obligatory. Further studies are needed to understand and avoid reasons for the development of PTSD or other potential problems of responders.

Keywords: PTSD; disaster medicine; humanitarian assistance; responder; stress reaction.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Computer Simulation
  • Disasters*
  • Emergency Responders / psychology*
  • Female
  • Germany
  • Humans
  • Longitudinal Studies
  • Male
  • Medical Missions*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Relief Work*
  • Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic*
  • Stress, Psychological*