Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: A Brief Review of Nuclear and Nonnuclear Techniques and Comparative Evaluation of Recent Advances

Indian J Nucl Med. 2019 Oct-Dec;34(4):263-270. doi: 10.4103/ijnm.IJNM_90_19.

Abstract

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Invasive coronary angiography (ICA) is the gold standard for the evaluation of epicardial CAD. In the pathogenesis of the CAD, myocardial perfusion abnormalities are the first changes that appear followed by wall motion abnormalities, electrocardiogram changes, and angina. Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) demonstrates the cumulative effect of pathology at epicardial coronary arteries, small vessels, and endothelium. Thus, it evaluates the overall burden of ischemic heart disease (IHD). MPI is used noninvasively to diagnose early asymptomatic CAD or to know the functional significance of known CAD. There are evidence that early detection of myocardial perfusion abnormalities followed by aggressive intervention against cardiovascular risk factors may restore myocardial perfusion. This may lead to reduce morbidity and mortality. Various MPI modalities have been used to diagnose and define the severity of CAD. Cardiac myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (myocardial perfusion scintigraphy [MPS]) has been in use since decades. Several newer modalities such as positron emission tomography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography perfusion, and myocardial contrast echocardiography are developing utilizing the similar principle of MPS. We shall be reviewing briefly these modalities, their performance, comparison to each other, and with ICA.

Keywords: Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging; cardiac myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography; computed tomography perfusion; coronary artery disease; invasive coronary angiography; myocardial contrast echocardiography; positron emission tomography.

Publication types

  • Review