Is proteomics of value in cardiovascular risk assessment?

Curr Opin Lipidol. 2019 Dec;30(6):452-461. doi: 10.1097/MOL.0000000000000639.

Abstract

Purpose of review: To briefly summarize recently published evidence in the field of cardiovascular proteomics, focusing on its ability to improve cardiovascular risk stratification and critically discussing still open and burning issues and future perspectives of proteomics research.

Recent findings: Several epidemiological studies have demonstrated an improvement in cardiovascular risk prediction beyond traditional risk factors by adding novel biomarkers, identified by both discovery and targeted proteomics. However, only a moderate improvement in risk discrimination over clinical variables was observed. Moreover, despite different outcomes there was also a strong overlap of identified candidates, with several of them being already well established cardiovascular risk markers such as growth differentiation factor 15, natriuretic peptides, C-reactive protein, interleukins, and metalloproteases.

Summary: Although proteomics plays a crucial role in biomarker discovery, the modest discriminative ability of this technique raises the possibility that there are still hidden mechanisms in protein regulatory networks, which urgently need to be evaluated to improve a cardiovascular risk assessment to a clinically significant extent.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Biomarkers / metabolism
  • C-Reactive Protein / metabolism
  • Cardiovascular Diseases / metabolism*
  • Growth Differentiation Factor 15 / metabolism
  • Humans
  • Interleukins / metabolism
  • Metalloproteases / metabolism
  • Natriuretic Peptides / metabolism
  • Proteomics*
  • Risk Assessment
  • Risk Factors

Substances

  • Biomarkers
  • GDF15 protein, human
  • Growth Differentiation Factor 15
  • Interleukins
  • Natriuretic Peptides
  • C-Reactive Protein
  • Metalloproteases