Experiences of participating in intergenerational interventions in older people's care settings: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative literature

J Adv Nurs. 2020 Jan;76(1):22-33. doi: 10.1111/jan.14214. Epub 2019 Oct 6.

Abstract

Aims: To synthesize the findings of qualitative research exploring the experiences of being involved in intergenerational interventions in older people's care settings.

Design: A meta-synthesis of the qualitative literature, employing Sandelowski and Barroso's method, was conducted.

Data sources: Eight databases were searched in March 2017.

Review methods: The PRISMA statement was used for reporting the different phases of the literature search and the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) qualitative research checklist was used as an appraisal framework. Data synthesis was conducted using Sandelowski and Barroso's method.

Results: Four qualitative studies were included in the meta-synthesis. Thematic analysis revealed four themes: 'Recreating the family'; 'Building intergenerational empathy and respect'; 'Uplifting and energizing'; and 'Engagement risks and challenges'.

Conclusion: The meta-synthesis strengthens the evidence that intergenerational interventions can be positive. However, it also shows that there may also be some negative aspects if not planned or managed carefully.

Impact: This review contributes to the body of evidence by synthesizing the experiences of older people and children involved in intergenerational interventions. Although qualitative literature supports the quantitative evidence that intergenerational interventions can have a positive effect, intergenerational interventions could also have negative effects on some participants. Older people may feel tired, or experience feelings of infantilization. Practitioners need to be more aware of the potential negative effects of intergenerational interventions and include risk assessment, possibly by requiring ethical scrutiny.

目的: 在于综合定性研究的调查结果,探索在老年人护理环境中参与代际干预方面的经历。 设计: 采用了Sandelowski 和Barroso的方法对定性文献进行综合集成。 资料来源: 在2017年3月,搜寻了了8个数据库。 综述方法: 使用了PRISMA声明来报告文献搜索的不同阶段,关键评估技能计划(Critical Appraisal Skills Programme,CASP)定性研究核对表被用作一种评估框架。使用Sandelowski 和Barroso的方法进行数据合成。 结果: 综合集成包括四项定性研究。主题分析揭示了四大主题:‘重建家庭’;建立代际同情心和相互尊重;‘提升和激励’;和‘参与风险和相关挑战’。 结论: 综合集成巩固了代际干预可能积极性的证据。然而,这也表明,如果不仔细进行规划或管理,也可能存在一些负面影响。 影响: 这篇综述综合了参与代际干预的老年人和儿童之经历,从而有助于收集大量证据。虽然定性文献支持代际干预可以产生积极影响的定量证据,但代际干预也可能对一些参与者产生负面影响。老年人可能会感到疲倦,或者经历诸多幼稚化的感觉。执业医师们需要更加注意代际干预的潜在负面影响,并将其纳入到风险评估中,可能需要进行处方药方面的审查。.

Keywords: children; intergenerational program; meta-synthesis; nurses; older people; patient's perspective; relationships.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Child
  • Housing for the Elderly
  • Humans
  • Intergenerational Relations*
  • Qualitative Research