The right place for Sulphonylureas today

Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019 Nov:157:107836. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.107836. Epub 2019 Aug 31.

Abstract

The place of Sulphonylurea based insulin secretagogues in the management of Type 2 diabetes appears as controversial today as it was fifty years ago. Newer therapies are associated with less hypoglycaemia and weight gain than Sulphonylureas but currently cost more and lack assurances which come with long-term exposure. Emergence of recent CVOT data for SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists is likely to influence therapeutic choices and guidance is now supportive of their earlier use in cases at high risk of cardiovascular disease. Meta-analyses of Sulphonylurea trials have failed to indicate a consistent effect (positive or negative) on cardiovascular disease or mortality, although are limited by the relative scarcity of studies directly reporting these outcomes. The CAROLINA trial is reassuring in demonstrating cardiovascular safety for the Sulphonylurea Glimepiride when compared directly with the DPP-4 inhibitor Linagliptin, suggesting either of these agents would be relatively safe second line options after Metformin in the majority of patients. This review provides a balanced assessment of available Sulphonylurea treatments in the context of current cardiovascular outcome trial data (CVOT) data and hopefully assists informed decision making about the place of these drugs in contemporary glucose lowering practice.

Keywords: Cardiovascular outcomes; Glucose lowering; Medicines management; Sulphonylureas.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 / drug therapy*
  • Humans
  • Hypoglycemic Agents / pharmacology
  • Hypoglycemic Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Middle Aged
  • Sulfonylurea Compounds / pharmacology
  • Sulfonylurea Compounds / therapeutic use*

Substances

  • Hypoglycemic Agents
  • Sulfonylurea Compounds