Since 1993, over 20 new anti-seizure drugs (ASDs) have been identified in well-established animal seizure and epilepsy models and subsequently demonstrated to be clinically effective in double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trials in patients with focal onset seizures. All clinically-available ASDs on the market today are effective in at least one of only three preclinical seizure and epilepsy models: the acute maximal electroshock (MES), the acute subcutaneous pentylenetetrazol (scPTZ) test, or the kindled rodent with chronic evoked seizures. Thus, it reasons that preclinical ASD discovery does not need significant revision to successfully identify ASDs for the symptomatic treatment of epilepsy. Unfortunately, a significant need still persists for more efficacious and better tolerated ASDs. This is particularly true for those patients whose seizures remain drug resistant. This review will focus on the continued utility of the acute MES and scPTZ tests, as well as the kindled rodent for current and future ASD discovery. These are the only "clinically validated" rodent models to date and been heavily used in the search for novel and more efficacious ASDs. This is to say that promising ASDs have been brought to the clinic on the basis of efficacy in these particular seizure and epilepsy models alone. This review also discusses some of the inherent advantages and limitations of these models relative to existing and emerging preclinical models. It then offers insight into future efforts to develop a preclinical model that will advance a truly transformative therapy for the symptomatic treatment of difficult to treat focal onset epilepsy. This article is part of the special issue entitled 'New Epilepsy Therapies for the 21st Century - From Antiseizure Drugs to Prevention, Modification and Cure of Epilepsy'.
Keywords: ASD discovery; Animal models; Epilepsy; Kindling; MES; Maximal electroshock; PTZ; Pentylenetetrazol; Seizure.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.