Analysis of engagement between ethics and return-to-work discourses in respective academic literature

Work. 2019;64(1):3-19. doi: 10.3233/WOR-192973.

Abstract

Background: Return-to-work (RTW)/back-to-work (BTW) interventions that are designed to rehabilitate individuals impaired from fulfilling employment roles are facing challenges. Ethics discourses, including ethics theories, principles and concepts, are meant to give guidance on what one ought to do or not to do and RTW professionals could use them to respond to their challenges.

Objective: A scoping review was performed to investigate to what extent 33 ethics concepts, theories, and principles are employed in RTW/BTW academic literature, and to what extent RTW/BTW is engaged with in ethics linked academic journals.

Methods: Three academic databases were searched, and 147 article results were extracted from our literature review to be thematically analyzed.

Results: Searches with n = 11 ethics concepts and n = 4 ethics theories generated results. The content of 20 RTW/BTW article results demonstrated conceptual engagement between RTW and ethics discourses. Only one article in ethics-related journals conceptually engaged with RTW/BTW.

Conclusion: Ethics theories and principles were not used extensively in RTW/BTW academic literature and RTW/BTW is a topic under-engaged within ethics-related journals. Our findings indicate opportunities for further research, like conducting interviews, to better understand our findings and how to respond to them.

Keywords: Back to work; conceptual engagement; ethical reasoning; ethics concepts; ethics theories.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Ethics*
  • Humans
  • Occupational Injuries / rehabilitation
  • Return to Work / ethics*