A comparison of drone imagery and ground-based methods for estimating the extent of habitat destruction by lesser snow geese (Anser caerulescens caerulescens) in La Pérouse Bay

PLoS One. 2019 Aug 9;14(8):e0217049. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217049. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Lesser snow goose (Anser caerulescens caerulescens) populations have dramatically altered vegetation communities through increased foraging pressure. In remote regions, regular habitat assessments are logistically challenging and time consuming. Drones are increasingly being used by ecologists to conduct habitat assessments, but reliance on georeferenced data as ground truth may not always be feasible. We estimated goose habitat degradation using photointerpretation of drone imagery and compared estimates to those made with ground-based linear transects. In July 2016, we surveyed five study plots in La Pérouse Bay, Manitoba, to evaluate the effectiveness of a fixed-wing drone with simple Red Green Blue (RGB) imagery for evaluating habitat degradation by snow geese. Ground-based land cover data was collected and grouped into barren, shrub, or non-shrub categories. We compared estimates between ground-based transects and those made from unsupervised classification of drone imagery collected at altitudes of 75, 100, and 120 m above ground level (ground sampling distances of 2.4, 3.2, and 3.8 cm respectively). We found large time savings during the data collection step of drone surveys, but these savings were ultimately lost during imagery processing. Based on photointerpretation, overall accuracy of drone imagery was generally high (88.8% to 92.0%) and Kappa coefficients were similar to previously published habitat assessments from drone imagery. Mixed model estimates indicated 75m drone imagery overestimated barren (F2,182 = 100.03, P < 0.0001) and shrub classes (F2,182 = 160.16, P < 0.0001) compared to ground estimates. Inconspicuous graminoid and forb species (non-shrubs) were difficult to detect from drone imagery and were underestimated compared to ground-based transects (F2,182 = 843.77, P < 0.0001). Our findings corroborate previous findings, and that simple RGB imagery is useful for evaluating broad scale goose damage, and may play an important role in measuring habitat destruction by geese and other agents of environmental change.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Anseriformes*
  • Bays*
  • Conservation of Natural Resources*
  • Ecosystem*
  • Environmental Monitoring / methods*
  • Image Processing, Computer-Assisted

Grants and funding

This work was supported by North Dakota EPSCOR #IIA-1355466 (https://www.ndepscor.ndus.edu/)to SNE; Arctic Goose Joint Venture (https://www.agjv.ca/) to RFR; Central (https://centralflyway.org/) and Mississippi Flyway Councils (http://mississippi.flyways.us/) to RFR; North Dakota View Scholarship (https://arts-sciences.und.edu/academics/geography/) and UND Intercollegiate Academics Fund (https://www1.und.edu/research/about/division-offices/grants-and-funding/intercollegiate-academics-fund.cfm) to AFB; North Dakota EPSCoR Infrastructure Improvement Program- Doctoral Dissertation Assistantship #OIA-1355466 (https://www.ndepscor.ndus.edu/) to SNE and AFB; UND College of Arts and Sciences (https://arts-sciences.und.edu/), and UND Biology (https://arts-sciences.und.edu/biology/) to SNE and AFB. North Dakota Department of Commerce (https://www.commerce.nd.gov/): awarded to Susan Ellis-Felege. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.