[Atrial fibrillation in patients with sepsis and non-cardiac infections]

Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2019 Sep;30(3):256-261. doi: 10.1007/s00399-019-0633-z. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
[Article in German]

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is by far the most frequent cardiac arrhythmia associated with sepsis and infections. Newly occurring AF due to infections is associated with a deterioration of the prognosis for acute events and also for the long-term prognosis of patients. The risk of developing AF during an infection depends on general (e.g. age, structural heart disease) as well as infection-specific risk factors (e.g. sepsis severity, vasopressor treatment). Current guidelines do not make specific recommendations on the treatment of infection-associated AF and very few prospective data are available. The use of beta blockers appears to be safe for both prevention and frequency control of AF even in patients requiring catecholamines. For specific antiarrhythmic treatment, the use of class I antiarrhythmic agents is conceivable as an alternative to the predominantly used amiodarone. Newly occurring AF within infections has long been considered a specific entity with a low risk of recurrence, so that only a small proportion of patients received long-term effective anticoagulation; however, data from large retrospective studies suggest significantly higher recurrence rates. Therefore, the question of whether this group of patients benefits from long-term effective anticoagulation and extended monitoring of arrhythmia should be the subject of future research.

Keywords: Anticoagulation; Cardiac arrhythmia; Cardiac diseases; Infections; Sepsis.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Anti-Arrhythmia Agents
  • Atrial Fibrillation*
  • Humans
  • Prospective Studies
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Sepsis*

Substances

  • Anti-Arrhythmia Agents