Proximal gastrectomy versus total gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: a meta-analysis

J Comp Eff Res. 2019 Jul;8(10):753-766. doi: 10.2217/cer-2019-0016. Epub 2019 Jul 30.

Abstract

Aim: To compare efficacy between total gastrectomy (TG) and proximal gastrectomy (PG) for upper-third gastric cancer. Materials & methods: PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library were searched to select suitable researches. Stata was used for meta-analysis including 5-year overall survival rate, recurrence rate, complication morbidities and serum nutritional levels. Results: Ten retrospective English researches were contained. Our study showed no significant difference of 5-year overall survival rate, recurrence rate, reflux symptoms and anastomotic leakage. TG experienced longer operation time, more lymph nodes-retrieved number, more estimated blood loss and higher ileus, but less anastomotic stricture. PG showed advantages over TG in terms of serum nutritional levels. Conclusion: PG is more preferable to TG for treatment of upper-third gastric cancer.

Keywords: gastroenterology/hepatology; oncology; outcomes research.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Meta-Analysis
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adenocarcinoma / surgery*
  • Esophagogastric Junction / surgery*
  • Female
  • Gastrectomy / methods*
  • Humans
  • Operative Time
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Stomach Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Survival Rate
  • Treatment Outcome