The effects of interacting with fish in aquariums on human health and well-being: A systematic review

PLoS One. 2019 Jul 29;14(7):e0220524. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220524. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Background: Most research into the health benefits of human-animal interaction has focused on species that interact physically with humans, such as dogs. This may be unsuitable for certain populations for reasons including accessibility and the risk of negative consequences to both the person and the animal. However, some research has associated viewing fish in aquariums with positive well-being outcomes; as there is no physical contact with the animal, this form of interaction carries less risk. At present, little is known about the specific benefits of human-fish interaction.

Objectives: To explore current evidence relating to the psychological and physiological benefits of interacting with fish in aquariums.

Methods: Systematic searches were conducted to identify relevant primary research of any design. All forms of interaction were considered, including keeping fish as companion animals and fish aquarium-based interventions. "Non-live" alternatives, such as videos, were also considered. This review was conducted according to a registered protocol (PROSPERO ID: CRD42018090466).

Results: Nineteen studies were included. Two provided tentative evidence that keeping home aquaria is associated with relaxation. The remaining studies involved novel interactions with fish in home or public aquariums. Outcomes relating to anxiety, relaxation and/or physiological stress were commonly assessed; evidence was mixed with both positive and null findings. Preliminary support was found for effects on mood, pain, nutritional intake and body weight, but not loneliness. All studies had methodological issues and risk of bias was either high or unclear.

Conclusions: Review findings suggest that interacting with fish in aquariums has the potential to benefit human well-being, although research on this topic is currently limited. Future research should aim to address gaps in the evidence, such as whether and how the type of human-fish interaction can influence well-being outcomes. Researchers should also aim to address the methodological concerns highlighted in this review.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Animal Assisted Therapy / methods*
  • Animals
  • Fishes
  • Health Status
  • Human-Animal Bond*
  • Humans
  • Quality of Life*
  • Social Determinants of Health / statistics & numerical data*

Grants and funding

This systematic review was conducted as part of the first author’s (HC) PhD. Partial funding for this PhD was secured by KS from Mars Petcare UK. Two authors (NG and DS) are employees of the WALTHAM Centre for Pet Nutrition, a Mars Petcare research centre. Neither NG or DS were involved in data collection or analysis, but both provided feedback on the protocol and earlier drafts of the manuscript. Mars Petcare UK played no role in study design, data collection, or analysis, but approved the final manuscript before publication. The remaining funding for the PhD was secured from the University of the West of Scotland.