Background: The modified Bentall procedure is still the treatment of choice for patients requiring combined replacement of the ascending aorta and aortic valve. We compared the long-term outcome of patients >65 years of age undergoing Bentall procedure with biological vs mechanical valved conduits in a multi institutional study.
Methods: A total of 282 patients, undergoing a Bentall operation (January 1994-May 2015), with a biological (Group 1, 173 patients) or a mechanical (Group 2, 109 patients) conduit were reviewed, the primary outcome being analysis of late survival and freedom from major adverse events.
Results: Hospital mortality was 5% (9 patients) and 2% (2 patients) for Group 1 and Group 2 (p = 0.2). Median follow-up was 77 months (range Q1-Q3: 49-111) for Group 1 vs 107 months (range Q1-Q3: 63-145) for Group 2 (p < 0.001). A not statistically significant advantage in late survival was found in patients receiving mechanical valved conduits (36% for Group 1 vs 58% for Group 2 at 12 years; p = 0.09), although freedom from major adverse events was similar between the 2 groups (33% in Group 1 vs 50% in Group 2 at 12 years; p = 0.3).
Conclusions: In conclusion, mechanical-valved conduits employed for the modified Bentall procedure show a trend towards an improved late survival in patients ≥65 years of age and particularly in those between 65 and 75 years, despite a higher incidence of major adverse events. Our results indicate the need for specific guidelines to better define the ideal age limit for each type of valved conduit.
Keywords: Bentall procedure; Biological valved conduit; Elderly patients; Mechanical valved conduit.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.