Global Change: a Public Health Researcher's Ethical Responsibility

Curr Environ Health Rep. 2019 Sep;6(3):160-166. doi: 10.1007/s40572-019-00238-4.

Abstract

Purpose of review: Loss of biodiversity and globalized environmental degradation result in planetary-scale changes which impact human societies.

Recent findings: This paper highlights the urgency for public health researchers to integrate a global change perspective into their daily work. The public health community needs to answer several questions, e.g., how to weight the health of present and future generations; how to balance between the possible immediate adverse impacts of mitigating climate change vs long-term adverse impacts of global change; how to limit the environmental impacts of public health intervention; and how to allocate resources. Public health practitioners are faced with a moral responsibility to address these challenges. Key elements to ensure long-lasting, innovative global change and health solutions include (i) empowering the population; (ii) tailoring the framing of global change and health impacts for different stakeholders; (iii) adopting less conservative approaches on reporting future scenarios; (iv) increasing accountability about the health impacts of mitigation and adaptation strategies; and (v) recognizing the limits of science.

Keywords: Biodiversity; Climate change; Ethics; Global change; Planetary health; Public health.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Climate Change / statistics & numerical data*
  • Conservation of Natural Resources / statistics & numerical data*
  • Ecosystem
  • Environment
  • Humans
  • Morals
  • Public Health / ethics*
  • Public Health Practice / ethics*