Geographic isolation has long been hypothesized to have a role in the origins and development of mental disabilities. A considerable body of research has established such a correlation. However, study designs have limited researchers' ability to establish a causal connection and rule out rival hypotheses. This study, therefore, aims to assess the strength of the geographic isolation - mental disability relationship and to disentangle it from alternative possibilities, namely that it reflects socioeconomic status, social isolation, economic inequality, or reverse causation. The study employs an analysis of variations in the rates of mental disability throughout 2960 U.S. counties using both Census and CDC data. In addition to partial correlation and ordinary least square analyses, the study employs two-stage least squares regression with instrumental variables (2SLS-IV), a procedure that permits resolution of the problem of endogeneity involving the potential effects of unmeasured variables and reverse causation. Results reveal that the initial bivariate effects of geographic isolation on rates of mental disability are robust after controls for socioeconomic status, income inequality, social isolation, and other predictors are introduced and when tested with the 2SLS-IV procedure. Most variation (54.4%) in county mental disability rates is accounted for by the independent effects of geographic isolation, socioeconomic status, income inequality, and other variables. The results presented, although not conclusive, supports more targeted service planning and more equitable resource investments in rural parts of the United States and other nations.
Keywords: Geographic isolation; Income inequality; Mental disability; Social isolation; Socioeconomic status.