Anecdotally, Veterinary Feed Directive prescriptions in the southeastern United States (U.S.) are written most often for treatment and prevention of bovine anaplasmosis (BA) but seroprevalence estimates and factors associated with this disease are currently unavailable in Mississippi (MS). Bovine anaplasmosis, a tick-borne disease of cattle caused by Anaplasma marginale, remains an economically important disease in U.S. The lack of recent seroprevalence of BA throughout the U.S. makes accurate assessment of production losses incurred by the cattle industry in the U.S. difficult, if not impossible to estimate. This study was aimed at determining the seroprevalence of and factors associated with BA in MS. Data were obtained from an active survey of 207 beef cows slaughtered between May 2013 and December, 2014 as well as from reviewing 5182 Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratories (VDLs) records of specimens from MS submitted for BA testing between 2002 and 2018. From the active surveillance, the overall observed apparent seroprevalence of BA in MS with cELISA was 28.99% (95% CI: 23.23 - 35.50%) while the estimated true seroprevalence was 29.02% (22.74 - 36.07%). However, from the laboratory records, the overall apparent period seroprevalence of BA in MS between 2002 and 2018 irrespective of diagnostic assay used was 16.72% (15.73 - 17.76%) and yearly increase in the diagnosis of BA followed a significant trend (P < 0.0001). With cELISA, the apparent seroprevalence of BA was 22.11% (20.78 - 23.49%) and the estimated true seroprevalence was 21.62% (20.18 - 23.11%). However, with CFT, the apparent seroprevalence of BA was 13.50% (10.75 - 16.81%) and the estimated true seroprevalence was 47.90% (36.30 - 61.87%). Factors associated with positive BA results were age, cattle type, and quarter of the year the specimens were submitted. The odds of the outcome were 22 as high in adults, 27 times as high in beef cattle, and 2 times as high between October to December in comparisons to juveniles, dairy cattle, and between April to June, respectively. Cattle population in the counties was not associated with positive BA results. Current records from the VDLs appear to accurately estimate the seroprevalence of BA in MS and thus serves as a reliable surveillance tool BA in the state. Because the burden of BA appears to be distributed throughout the state, future prevention and control measures for BA should focus on the identified putative risk factors and be intensified throughout MS.
Keywords: Anaplasma marginale; Anaplasmosis; Mississippi; Seroprevalence; Surveillance.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.