Re-examination of perinatal mental health policy frameworks for women signalling distress on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) completed during their antenatal booking-in consultation: a call for population health intervention

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Jul 2;19(1):221. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2378-4.

Abstract

Background: Globally, anxiety and depression are the most common complications of the perinatal period (conception to 1 year postpartum). It is now recognised that anxiety and depression are more commonly found antenatally than postnatally and represent the greatest risk factor for developing postnatal depression. Research in this space has focused on treatment of postnatal depression, with limited attention paid to preventative strategies for women signalling distress, who are subthreshold for diagnosable illness.

Main text: The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) was introduced in 1987 and has since been validated as a depression screening tool in the Australian and international setting. The EPDS has been embedded as a depression screening tool within a broader psychosocial assessment for women who receive their maternity care in the public system in Australia. Owing to perceived service restrictions, an EPDS score must reach a threshold of 13 or more to warrant specific assessment or intervention. Current policy frameworks focus on tertiary prevention models, and those women scoring 10 to 12, who could reasonably be considered as signalling distress or early signs of illness, are not currently offered intervention. The consequences of undetected or untreated perinatal mood or anxiety disorder (often co-morbid) include maternal psychological, social, occupational and physical dysfunction, and extend to deleterious infant and child life-course effects. This provides a strong justification to explore the role of preventative programs for women who are distressed. A range of low-resource, population-based interventions are available and effective. We explore the evidence for a selection of these programs. Further research is needed to decipher their effectiveness as a secondary prevention approach in women who are currently signalling distress during antenatal assessment.

Conclusion: The burden of perinatal mood disorders, and their potential for prolonged impact, justify the exploration of preventatively-focused programs in women who signal distress during antenatal care.

Keywords: Depression; Distress; EPDS; Perinatal; Policy; Pregnancy; Prevention; Risk-stratification; Screening.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Anxiety / complications
  • Anxiety / diagnosis
  • Australia
  • Depression / complications
  • Depression / diagnosis
  • Female
  • Health Policy
  • Humans
  • Mental Health
  • Population Health
  • Pregnancy
  • Pregnancy Complications / diagnosis*
  • Pregnancy Complications / psychology
  • Prenatal Care / standards*
  • Prenatal Diagnosis / methods
  • Prenatal Diagnosis / standards*
  • Psychiatric Status Rating Scales / standards*
  • Referral and Consultation / standards*
  • Risk Factors
  • Surveys and Questionnaires