False memory rates differ in individuals with high versus low cognitive reserve and between young-old and old-old age groups. Here we tested how two types of false memory (false alarms to new items and source memory) in two age groups differed with cognitive reserve. Subjects were presented with words and either instructed to generate a past event from their memory associated with the word or to imagine a future event associated with the word. At test, participants were instructed to determine whether the event was a past, future, or new event. Results showed overall false memory rates were lower for young-old adults and those with high reserve. Critically, low cognitive reserve was most associated with source memory errors in young-old but not old-old adults. Reflecting the opposite pattern, false alarms to new items were most associated with low cognitive reserve for old-old, but not young-old adults. These results seem to suggest two different classes of false memories in old age. That is, cognitive reserve was most protective for familiar lures in earlier stages of old age, whereas it was most protective for new lures in later stages of old age. These results support the idea that retrieval monitoring deteriorates with age, potentially due to declines in working memory capacity, but that the decline may be attenuated by cognitive reserve. Furthermore, we suggest that different levels of working memory capacity may be required for monitoring source memory versus item memory, leading to differential effects of cognitive reserve depending upon age.
Keywords: autobiographical memory; cognitive reserve; false memories; older adults; reality monitoring.