Highlights, limitations and future challenges of laparoscopic resection for colorectal liver metastases

J Visc Surg. 2019 Sep;156(4):329-337. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2019.04.006. Epub 2019 May 14.

Abstract

The liver is the most common site for metastatic colorectal cancer (CRLM). Despite advances in oncologic treatment, resection of metastases is still the only curative option. Although laparoscopic surgery for primary colorectal cancer is well documented and widely used, laparoscopic surgery for liver metastases has developed more slowly. However, in spite of some difficulties, laparoscopic approach demonstrated strong advantages including minimal parietal damage, decreased morbidity (reduced blood loss and need for transfusion, fewer pulmonary complications), and simplification of subsequent iterative hepatectomy. Up to now, more than 9 000 laparoscopic procedures have been reported worldwide and long-term results in colorectal liver metastases seem comparable to the open approach. Only one recent randomized controlled trial has compared the laparoscopic and the open approach. The purpose of the present update was to identify the barriers limiting widespread acceptance of laparoscopic approach, the benefits and the limits of laparoscopic hepatectomies in CRLM.

Keywords: Colorectal liver metastases; Laparoscopic liver resection; Open approach; Postoperative outcomes; Survival.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Blood Loss, Surgical / prevention & control
  • Colorectal Neoplasms / pathology*
  • Embolism, Air / etiology
  • Forecasting
  • Hemostasis, Surgical
  • Hepatectomy / adverse effects
  • Hepatectomy / methods*
  • Humans
  • Laparoscopy* / adverse effects
  • Laparoscopy* / instrumentation
  • Laparoscopy* / methods
  • Laparoscopy* / trends
  • Learning Curve
  • Length of Stay
  • Liver Neoplasms / secondary*
  • Liver Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Postoperative Complications / etiology