Liquid Biopsy: Is There an Advantage to Analyzing Circulating Exosomal DNA Compared to cfDNA or Are They the Same?

Cancer Res. 2019 May 15;79(10):2462-2465. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-19-0019. Epub 2019 May 1.

Abstract

Cancer is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. This life-threatening disease requires novel strategies for the early detection and therapy response prediction. Circulating DNA was first described 70 years ago. However, only the recent evolution in the PCR-based sequencing techniques allow the minimally invasive molecular profiling of circulating mutant DNA from small-volume "liquid biopsies" such as blood, urine, or saliva. In this article, we aim to summarize the fast-growing evidence for cfDNA and exosomal DNA as minimally invasive diagnostic markers in solid tumors and to highlight their opposing diagnostic advantages and disadvantages.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Biomarkers, Tumor / blood
  • Biomarkers, Tumor / metabolism
  • Cell-Free Nucleic Acids / genetics*
  • DNA, Neoplasm / blood*
  • Exosomes / genetics*
  • Humans
  • Liquid Biopsy*
  • Neoplasms / blood
  • Neoplasms / diagnosis
  • Neoplasms / genetics
  • Polymerase Chain Reaction / methods

Substances

  • Biomarkers, Tumor
  • Cell-Free Nucleic Acids
  • DNA, Neoplasm