Interdisciplinary arts and health practice with an institutional logics perspective

Arts Health. 2019 Oct;11(3):219-231. doi: 10.1080/17533015.2018.1443950. Epub 2018 Mar 2.

Abstract

Background: Investigating the interdisciplinary relationships between stakeholders engaged in arts and health practice in the UK and Denmark, specifically with regard to institutional logics theory. The identified stakeholders: health professionals, museum educators and mental health service users. Method: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 30 participants: health professionals, museum educators and service users. Data were collected in Denmark and the UK. A thematic approach was used to analyse the data and theoretical lenses of sociological theories, and institutional logics explored the findings. Results: The interdisciplinary work in arts and health is complex, given the different disciplines and institutions involved. Findings illustrate that institutional logics play a vital and ambiguous part in arts and health practice and that this presents a challenge for interdisciplinary working in the field. Conclusions: Awareness of the complexity of multiple logics in the arts and health field; recognising the differences between disciplines and institutions could benefit from research and practice.

Keywords: Arts and health; institutional logics; interdisciplinary collaboration; mental health.

MeSH terms

  • Art Therapy*
  • Attitude of Health Personnel*
  • Denmark
  • Humans
  • Interviews as Topic
  • Mental Disorders / rehabilitation*
  • Mental Health Services*
  • Mentors
  • Museums
  • Nursing Staff, Hospital
  • Patient Care Team*
  • State Medicine
  • United Kingdom