Background and purpose: To compare the accuracy and utility of contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) (CEMRA) to Time of Flight MRA (TOF MRA) during detection and evaluation of occlusions on patients diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke (AIS).
Methods: This single-center study was approved by our local institutional research ethics board. From August 2014 to July 2016, 131 consecutive adult patients with confirmed AIS were included. Detection of an arterial occlusion and its characterization were evaluated independently with CEMRA or TOF MRA by two blinded neuroradiologists, then by consensus using all available MR sequences. A Cohen's Kappa coefficient (κ) and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to compare the two techniques.
Results: There was substantial concordance in the detection of arterial occlusion between CEMRA and TOF MRA (κ = 0.75). TOF MRA was more likely to show an arterial occlusion than CEMRA (63 versus 52 patients respectively). There were 13 and 1 false positive arterial occlusion with TOF MRA and CEMRA respectively, and 1 false negative with TOF MRA. There was excellent concordance between the location of arterial occlusions and CEMRA and TOF MRA [κ = 0.89 (0.72-0.97)]. CEMRA was significantly more likely to allow measurement of the thrombus than was TOF MRA [38 (75%) versus 14 (22%)] (P < 0.0001).
Conclusions: Our study showed that CEMRA imaging detected arterial occlusions better than TOF MRA in AIS patients and more precisely such that thrombus length and location could be known, which improves the patient's management and care.
Keywords: Arterial occlusion; CEMRA; Stroke.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.