Anterior subcutaneous internal fixator (INFIX) versus plate fixation for pelvic anterior ring fracture

Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 22;9(1):2578. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-39068-7.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes in patients with unstable anterior pelvic ring fractures after treatment with anterior subcutaneous internal fixator (INFIX) or plate fixation. We performed a retrospective study from August 2015 to October 2017. A consecutive series of 74 patients who underwent surgical treatment of their anterior pelvic ring (35 treated with INFIX and 39 treated with plates) were studied. Data collected included patients' demographic data, injury severity score (ISS), AO/OTA classification, injury mechanism, time to surgery, procedure time, and blood loss. The quality of postoperative reduction were assessed by postoperative radiographs using the Tornetta and Matta method. Functional outcome was evaluated using Majeed scoring system. In the INFIX group, ten patients developed LFCN paralysis, one patient suffered from superficial infection. Three screw loosening cases and two wound infection cases occurred in the plate group. INFIX is relatively minimally invasive and time-saving than the reconstruction plate in the treatment of anterior pelvic ring fracture. However, plate fixation increases the rate of anatomic reduction of the pelvic anterior ring fracture. Plates also provide a higher functional outcome compared with INFIX. INFIX is especially suitable in patients with urological injury, which can also decrease the wound infection rate.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Female
  • Fracture Fixation, Internal*
  • Fractures, Bone* / diagnostic imaging
  • Fractures, Bone* / surgery
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures*
  • Pelvic Bones* / diagnostic imaging
  • Pelvic Bones* / injuries
  • Pelvic Bones* / surgery
  • Retrospective Studies