Comparison of the biomechanics of radial head prostheses with dynamic loading in the radiocapitellar joint

J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2019 May;44(4):408-413. doi: 10.1177/1753193419825526. Epub 2019 Feb 11.

Abstract

We used eight fresh cadaveric elbows to evaluate the biomechanical characteristics of the native radial head, an anatomic radial head prosthesis, and a non-anatomic radial head prosthesis using a dynamic model. The biceps, brachialis, and triceps were attached to pneumatic actuators loaded to mimic muscle force. The radiocapitellar contact pressure and area were measured in real time, and the associated curves were depicted simultaneously. No significant differences in the contact area or associated curves were found between native radial head and the anatomic radial head prosthesis. The contact pressure and associated curve for the anatomic radial head prosthesis were better than those for the non-anatomic radial head prosthesis. We conclude from this study that the contact pressure and area of the elbow with anatomic radial head prosthesis are similar to those of the native radial head. The anatomic radial head prosthesis appears to be more suitable in clinical use.

Keywords: Radial head replacement; biomechanics; radial head prosthesis; radiocapitellar joint.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Biomechanical Phenomena / physiology
  • Cadaver
  • Elbow Joint / physiology*
  • Elbow Joint / surgery*
  • Elbow Prosthesis*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pressure
  • Radius / surgery*
  • Weight-Bearing / physiology