Background: Reported risk factors for the development of a psychogenic movement disorder (PMD) include young age, female gender, history of abuse, current or past psychiatric disorder, lower levels of education and socioeconomic status, and employment as a healthcare worker. Although employment in healthcare is included in several diagnostic criteria for PMD, as well as in many case series, this association has never been validated.
Methods: Using the University of Maryland Movement Disorder Database (UMMDD), we identified PMD cases, as well as patients with isolated focal dystonia as controls. An experienced movement disorder specialist diagnosed all patients, and all cases met criteria for clinically established PMD. Demographic and occupational histories were obtained from medical records and were supplemented by telephone interviews. PMD cases and controls were compared using t tests/χ2 tests.
Results: Controls (n = 148) were older than PMD cases (n = 132), with an average age of 61.4 and 52.1 years, respectively (P < 0.001); there were no significant differences between groups with respect to gender, education level, and ethnicity. The proportion of healthcare workers was not significantly different between PMD cases and controls (25% of PMD cases vs. 20% of controls; P = 0.28).
Conclusions: In contrast to traditional teaching, this investigation demonstrates that in our patient population, patients with a PMD were no more likely to be employed as healthcare workers than patients with isolated focal dystonia. This study calls into question the use of employment in healthcare as a reliable criterion to support the diagnosis of PMD.
Keywords: conversion disorder; functional movement disorder; healthcare worker; psychogenic movement disorder.