How was a national moving and handling people guideline intended to work? The underlying programme theory

Eval Program Plann. 2019 Apr:73:163-175. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.01.002. Epub 2019 Jan 14.

Abstract

In healthcare, moving and handling people (MHP) often cause musculoskeletal disorders. To prevent musculoskeletal disorders due to MHP, many national evidence-based guidelines have been developed. However, little is known about how these guidelines were intended to work, i.e. their 'programme theory', how implementation by intended users is influenced by contextual factors and mechanisms to produce outcomes. This paper identifies the programme theory of a national MHP guideline (MHPG) using thematic analysis of the MHPG document, three organisational planning documents, and interviews with MHPG developers. The analysis identified the intended users of the MHPG as health and safety managers and MHP coordinators. The programme theory comprised contextual factors, potentially hindering (e.g. budget constraints) or facilitating (e.g. changing demographics) implementation, being influenced by mechanisms mainly based on ethical (quality of care, evidence-based practices), and economic reasoning (reducing cost of MHP, return on investment) to reduce injuries caused by MHP - the intended outcome.

Keywords: CMO configuration; Contextual factors; Healthcare sector; Implementation research; Reasoning.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Delivery of Health Care
  • Guideline Adherence
  • Humans
  • Inservice Training / economics
  • Inservice Training / organization & administration*
  • Moving and Lifting Patients / standards*
  • New Zealand
  • Occupational Injuries / prevention & control
  • Organizational Culture
  • Policy Making
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic / standards*
  • Program Evaluation
  • Quality of Health Care / standards
  • Risk Assessment