Comparison of Population Aging in Europe and Asia Using a Time-Consistent and Comparative Aging Measure

J Aging Health. 2020 Jun/Jul;32(5-6):340-351. doi: 10.1177/0898264318824180. Epub 2019 Jan 17.

Abstract

Objective: We compare population aging in Europe and Asia using a measure that is both consistent over time and appropriate for cross-country comparison. Method: Sanderson and Scherbov proposed to estimate the old-age threshold by the age at which the remaining life expectancy (RLE) equals 15 years. We propose an adjustment of this measure, taking into account cross-national differences in the exceptionality of reaching that age. Results: Our old-age threshold was lower than 65 years in 2012 in Central Asia, Southern Asia, Southeastern Asia, and many Eastern European countries. These populations also experienced a higher share of elderly compared with the RLE15 method. Our method revealed more geographical diversity in the shares of elderly. Both methods exhibited similar time trends for the old-age thresholds and the shares of elderly. Discussion: Our prospective and comparative measure reveals higher population aging estimates in most Asian and Eastern European countries and more diversity in aging.

Keywords: Asia; Europe; adult survival; characteristics approach; population aging.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aging*
  • Asia / epidemiology
  • Asia, Central / epidemiology
  • Asia, Southeastern / epidemiology
  • Cross-Cultural Comparison
  • Europe, Eastern / epidemiology
  • Humans
  • Life Expectancy / trends
  • Population Dynamics*