No. 373-Cervical Insufficiency and Cervical Cerclage

J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019 Feb;41(2):233-247. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.08.009.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this guideline is to provide a framework that clinicians can use to determine which women are at greatest risk of having cervical insufficiency and in which set of circumstances a cerclage is of potential value.

Evidence: Published literature was retrieved through searches of PubMed or Medline, CINAHL, and The Cochrane Library in 2018 using appropriate controlled vocabulary (e.g., uterine cervical incompetence) and key words (e.g., cervical insufficiency, cerclage, Shirodkar, cerclage, McDonald, cerclage, abdominal, cervical length, mid-trimester pregnancy loss). Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized control trials/controlled clinical trials, and observational studies. There were no date or language restrictions. Searches were updated on a regular basis and incorporated in the guideline to June 2018. Grey (unpublished) literature was identified through searching the websites of health technology assessment and health technology-related agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and national and international medical specialty societies.

Values: The quality of evidence in this document was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.

Keywords: Cervical insufficiency; McDonald cerclage; Shirodkar cerclage; abdominal cerclage; cervical cerclage; cervical incompetence; cervical length; cervical shortening; prematurity; preterm delivery; rescue cerclage; transvaginal ultrasound.

Publication types

  • Practice Guideline

MeSH terms

  • Cerclage, Cervical*
  • Conservative Treatment
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Pregnancy
  • Uterine Cervical Incompetence / diagnosis
  • Uterine Cervical Incompetence / surgery*