Salience, Food Security, and SNAP Receipt

J Policy Anal Manage. 2019;38(1):124-54.

Abstract

Household food insecurity status in the United States is ascertained by a battery of close-ended questions. We posit that the monthly nature of benefit receipt from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) creates experiences of food hardship, which become salient in the context of SNAP receipt, and in turn exert influence on the response to food security questions. We test this hypothesis by examining answers to a 30-day food security module in relation to when SNAP benefits are received. We find that for SNAP households near the end of or at the beginning of the benefit month, the probability of being classified as food insecure increases by 11 percentage points, over a baseline of 42 percent. We also find that the probability of responding affirmatively to any of the first five items in the module increases during this time. We discuss the importance of these findings for the estimation of food security and its implication on program evaluation.

MeSH terms

  • Bias
  • Food Assistance / statistics & numerical data*
  • Food Supply / statistics & numerical data*
  • Humans
  • Research Design / statistics & numerical data
  • Surveys and Questionnaires / statistics & numerical data*
  • Time Factors
  • United States