Background: The extracardiac conduit technique is a valid option for completing total cavopulmonary anastomosis (TCPC) in patients with a single ventricle. The technique allows for beating heart surgery, optimal flow dynamics, and reduced postoperative atrial arrhythmia. Different types of conduit have been proposed. This study reported a single-centre experience with two different types of conduit.
Methods: Consecutive patients referred for TCPC at the current institution between January 2001 and September 2013 were included. Retrospective extraction of pertinent variables was accomplished through electronic patient chart review. Patients were stratified based on the type of conduit used to perform the TCPC: polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) conduit (Group A) and polyethylene-terephthalate (Dacron) conduit (Group B).
Results: The patient population included 105 patients: Group A had 80 patients, and Group B had 25 patients. The two groups were similar in major clinical and procedural variables, including conduit size and Nakata index. Eighteen patients (Group A: one [1.25%]; Group B: 17 [68%]) had conduit occlusion or severe stenosis requiring intervention after a mean 46.9±35months after the operation. The percentage of patients in Group A who were free of conduit obstruction at 3, 5, and 10 years was 100%, 100%, and 96%, respectively, whereas these figures were 68%, 52%, and 35% in Group B (log-rank <0.000). Conduit re-intervention was associated with an increased risk of overall mortality after primary intervention (p<0.004). Dacron tube was found to be an independent risk factor for mid-term stenosis or obstruction (hazard ratio, 62.9; 95% CI, 8.2-482.2; p=0.000).
Conclusion: Dacron conduit for TCPC surgery was associated with a higher risk of obstruction and need for early re-intervention compared with PTFE conduit. Surgical or percutaneous re-interventions for conduit obstruction increased the risk of late mortality.
Keywords: Cyanotic; Extracardiac conduit; Fontan.
Copyright © 2018 Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ANZSCTS) and the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.