Background: Centrifugation is the primary method used to perform urine sediment analyses, but evaluation of other methods is required to validate centrifugation.
Objectives: Non-urine materials were used to examine the repeatability (precision) and effectiveness (recovery) of four sediment methodologies on red blood cell (RBC) and white blood cell (WBC) counts.
Methods: Four urine sediment methods were compared using commercially available quality control material (QCM) and fresh canine RBCs in a diluent. Treatments included (a) 5 mL centrifugation at 390g for 5 minutes; (b) 1.5 mL centrifugation at 3900g for 45 seconds; (c) 60 µL of neat (unspun urine) in a microtiter well; and (d) 30 µL of neat on a slide with a coverslip. A within-run precision using QCM was followed by a one-run comparison test performed with a suspension of canine erythrocytes. RBC morphology was also examined.
Results: All results are listed in order of Methods A-D. Percent coefficients of variation (%CVs) for WBCs were 23.2%, 33.7%, 15.0%, and 27.2%. Red blood cells %CVs were 34.3%, 29.2%, 16.2%, and 24.4%. Average WBC counts in ten fields of view (FOV) ± 1 SD were 26.4 ± 6.1, 14.2 ± 4.8, 32.8 ± 4.9, and 1.6 ± 0.4. Average RBC counts in 10 fields of view (FOV) ± 1 SD were 45.3 ± 15.5, 23.9 ± 7.0, 38.4 ± 6.2, and 2.6 ± 0.6. The one-run comparison test reports average RBC counts per FOV at 55.2, 23.4, 92.8, and 13.8. The percentages of abnormal RBCs were 92.2%, 74.8%, 7.0%, and 55.1%.
Conclusions: Method C had the best reproducibility, a lower frequency of cell morphology abnormalities, and similar cellular counts to those of Methods A and B.
Keywords: Canine; urinalysis; urine.
© 2018 American Society for Veterinary Clinical Pathology.