Impact of two postural assist exoskeletons on biomechanical loading of the lumbar spine

Appl Ergon. 2019 Feb:75:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.09.006. Epub 2018 Sep 16.

Abstract

This study evaluated loading on the low back while wearing two commercially available postural assist exoskeletons. Ten male subjects lifted a box from multiple lift origins (combinations of vertical height and asymmetry) to a common destination using a squatting lifting technique with and without the use of either exoskeleton. Dependent measures included subject kinematics, moment arms between the torso or weight being lifted and the lumbar spine, and spinal loads as predicted by an electromyography-driven spine model. One of the exoskeletons tested (StrongArm Technologies™ FLx) reduced peak torso flexion at the shin lift origin, but differences in moment arms or spinal loads attributable to either of the interventions were not observed. Thus, industrial exoskeletons designed to control posture may not be beneficial in reducing biomechanical loads on the lumbar spine. Interventions altering the external manual materials handling environment (lift origin, load weight) may be more appropriate when implementation is fesible.

Keywords: Assistive device; Ergoskeleton; Low back pain; Passive exoskeleton.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Biomechanical Phenomena
  • Exoskeleton Device*
  • Humans
  • Lifting*
  • Lumbar Vertebrae / physiology*
  • Male
  • Posture*
  • Range of Motion, Articular
  • Weight-Bearing / physiology*