A Comparative Effectiveness Trial to Reduce Burnout and Improve Quality of Care

Adm Policy Ment Health. 2019 Mar;46(2):238-254. doi: 10.1007/s10488-018-0908-4.

Abstract

Clinician burnout is presumed to negatively impact healthcare quality; yet scant research has rigorously addressed this hypothesis. Using a mixed-methods, randomized, comparative effectiveness design, we tested two competing approaches to improve care-one addressing clinician burnout and the other addressing how clinicians interact with consumers-with 192 clinicians and 469 consumers at two community mental health centers. Although qualitative reports were promising, we found no comparative effectiveness for either intervention on burnout, patient-centered processes, or other outcomes. Discussion includes identifying ways to strengthen approaches to clinician burnout.

Keywords: Burnout; Mental health; Quality of care; Randomized comparative effectiveness.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Burnout, Professional / diagnosis
  • Burnout, Professional / prevention & control*
  • Burnout, Professional / therapy
  • Community Mental Health Centers / organization & administration*
  • Community Mental Health Centers / standards
  • Comparative Effectiveness Research
  • Female
  • Health Education / organization & administration*
  • Health Personnel / education*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Occupational Health
  • Patient-Centered Care / organization & administration
  • Quality of Health Care / organization & administration*
  • Quality of Health Care / standards