UPD16 itself is not a cause of intrauterine growth restriction

Fetal Pediatr Pathol. 2018 Dec;37(6):452-464. doi: 10.1080/15513815.2018.1538275. Epub 2018 Nov 23.

Abstract

Background: The clinical relevance of uniparental disomy (UPD16) for chromosome 16 is currently unclear.

Methods and result: We performed chromosome microarray analysis on two fetus and their placentas, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to exclude the hidden chr16 trisomy mosaicism in the fetuses, and clinical whole-exome sequencing to assess for homozygosity mutations of autosomal-recessive diseases.

Results: Microarray analysis of two fetuses had UPD16. The membranous placenta of the case 1 had confined placental mosaicism (CPM) for trisomy 16. Clinical whole-exome sequencing on chromosome 16 revealed three potentially pathogenic single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Gap-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and MLPA for a-thal deletions demonstrated that case 2 was homozygous for the -SEA deletion.

Conclusions: The poor outcome in these fetuses may be attributed to other factors, the membranous placenta and the -SEA deletion, respectively. Fetal UPD16 itself might be not correlated with intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and thus is not the basic cause of IUGR.

Keywords: chromosome microarray analysis; clinical whole-exome sequencing; intrauterine growth restriction; membranous placenta; uniparental disomy.

Publication types

  • Case Reports

MeSH terms

  • Chromosomes, Human, Pair 16 / genetics*
  • Female
  • Fetal Growth Retardation / genetics*
  • Humans
  • Placenta / pathology
  • Pregnancy
  • Uniparental Disomy / genetics*