Establishing company level fishing revenue and profit losses from fisheries: A bottom-up approach

PLoS One. 2018 Nov 20;13(11):e0207768. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207768. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

A third of global fish stocks are overexploited and many are economically underperforming, resulting in potential unrealized net economic benefits of USD 51 to 83 billion annually. However, this aggregate view, while useful for global policy discussion, may obscure the view for those actors who engage at a regional level. Therefore, we develop a method to associate large companies with their fishing operations and evaluate the biological sustainability of these operations. We link current fish biomass levels and landings to the revenue streams of the companies under study to compute potentially unrealized fisheries revenues and profits at the level of individual firms. We illustrate our method using two case studies: anchoveta (Engraulis ringens; Engraulidae) in Peru and menhaden in the USA (Brevoortia patronus and B. tyrannus; Clupeidae). We demonstrate that both these fisheries could potentially increase their revenues compared to the current levels of exploitation. We estimate the net but unrealized fishery benefits for the companies under question. This information could be useful to investors and business owners who might want to be aware of the actual fisheries performance options of the companies they invest in.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Conservation of Natural Resources / economics
  • Fisheries / economics*
  • Food Supply / economics

Grants and funding

Tim Cashion, Daniel Pauly and Dirk Zeller acknowledge the Sea Around Us and the Sea Around Us – Indian Ocean, a scientific initiative and partnership at the University of British Columbia and the University of Western Australia, respectively. Sea Around Us research is supported by the Oak Foundation, the Paul M. Angell Family Foundation, the Marisla Foundation, the David and Lucile Packard Foundation and the Bloomberg Family Foundation, with additional support from the MAVA Foundation. This work is a publication of the Fish Tracker Initiative, whose research is funded by the MAVA Foundation. Tim Cashion is also supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. U. Rashid Sumaila acknowledges the funding of the OceanCanada Partnership. Santiago de la Puente acknowledges the Ocean Leaders Graduate Fellowship that supports interdisciplinary marine scientists at UBC. Dyhia Belhabib acknowledges the support of the Paul M. Angell Family Foundation. The results of this study do not reflect the views of Ecotrust Canada. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.