Diurnal and seasonal variation of particle and dissolved organic matter release by the coral Acropora tenuis

PeerJ. 2018 Nov 7:6:e5728. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5728. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

Release rates of particulate organic carbon and nitrogen (POC and PON) and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) from the scleractinian coral Acropora tenuis were measured during the day and night in summer and winter seasons. Physiological parameters including calcification, photosynthesis and respiration rates were also measured simultaneously. The release rate of both POC and DOC was significantly higher in summer compared to winter and higher during the day compared to the night. The daily release rate of total organic carbon (POC + DOC) was 1,094 and 219 μmol C cm-2 d-1 for summer and winter, respectively, being 4.9 times higher in summer. The POC:PON ratios of the particulate organic matter released during daytime in both seasons (summer: 12.8 ± 5.7, winter: 12.0 ± 4.1) were significantly higher than those during nighttime (summer: 6.1 ± 2.5, winter: 2.2 ± 1.8). The DOC:POC ratio was 0.5 ± 0.03 during summer and 0.32 ± 0.98 during winter, suggesting higher mucus release in particulate form. Daily net production was estimated to be 199 and 158 μg C cm-2d-1 for summer and winter, respectively, with the amount of carbon released as mucus accounting for 6.5% and 1.6% of the net carbon fixation, respectively. The study reveals diurnal and seasonal changes in the quantity and quality of mucus released from this coral species. Since coral mucus is used as a food source by reef macro-organisms, and can also serve as an energy source for micro-organisms, the observed changes in mucus release rates are expected to influence the seasonal dynamics of organic carbon and nitrogen cycling over coral reefs.

Keywords: Acropora tenuis; Coral; Dissolved organic matter; Mucus; Particle organic matter.

Grants and funding

This work was supported by funding by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), Kakenhi, grant number: 15H04536. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.