Survival rates of short dental implants (≤6 mm) compared with implants longer than 6 mm in posterior jaw areas: A meta-analysis

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct:29 Suppl 16:8-20. doi: 10.1111/clr.13289.

Abstract

Purpose: To systematically review randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) reporting on the long-term survival and failure rates, as well as the complications of short implants (≤6 mm) versus longer implants (>6 mm) in posterior jaw areas.

Materials and methods: Electronic and manual searches were conducted to identify studies, specifically RCTs, reporting on short dental implants (≤6 mm) and their survival and complication rates compared with implants longer than 6 mm. Secondary outcomes analyzed were marginal bone loss and prosthesis survival rates.

Results: Ten RCTs fulfilled the inclusion criteria and featured a total of 637 short (≤6 mm) implants placed in 392 patients, while 653 standard implants (>6 mm) were inserted in 383 patients. The short implant survival rate ranged from 86.7% to 100%, whereas standard implant survival rate ranged from 95% to 100% with a follow-up from 1 to 5 years. The risk ratio (RR) for short implant failure compared to standard implants was 1.29 (95% CI: 0.67, 2.50, p = 0.45), demonstrating that overall, short implants presented higher risk of failure compared to longer implants. The heterogeneity test did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.67), suggesting low between-study heterogeneity. The prosthesis survival rates from the short implant groups ranged from 90% to 100% and from 95% to 100% for longer implant groups, respectively.

Conclusion: Short implants (≤6 mm) were found to have higher variability and lower predictability in survival rates compared to longer implants (>6 mm) after periods of 1-5 years in function. The mean survival rate was 96% (range: 86.7%-100%) for short implants, and 98% (range 95%-100%) for longer implants. Based on the quantity and quality of the evidence provided by 10 RCTs, short implants with ≤6 mm length should be carefully selected because they may present a greater risk for failure compared to implants longer than 6 mm.

Keywords: dental implants; short dental implants.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Alveolar Bone Loss
  • Databases, Factual
  • Dental Implantation, Endosseous / adverse effects
  • Dental Implantation, Endosseous / instrumentation
  • Dental Implants*
  • Dental Prosthesis Design*
  • Dental Restoration Failure / statistics & numerical data*
  • Humans
  • Prosthesis Failure*
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Survival Analysis

Substances

  • Dental Implants