The MIS5 Pietersburg at '28' Bushman Rock Shelter, Limpopo Province, South Africa

PLoS One. 2018 Oct 10;13(10):e0202853. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202853. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

In the past few decades, a diverse array of research has emphasized the precocity of technically advanced and symbolic practices occurring during the southern African Middle Stone Age. However, uncertainties regarding the regional chrono-cultural framework constrain models and identification of the cultural and ecological mechanisms triggering the development of such early innovative behaviours. Here, we present new results and a refined chronology for the Pietersburg, a techno-complex initially defined in the late 1920's, which has disappeared from the literature since the 1980's. We base our revision of this techno-complex on ongoing excavations at Bushman Rock Shelter (BRS) in Limpopo Province, South Africa, where two Pietersburg phases (an upper phase called '21' and a lower phase called '28') are recognized. Our analysis focuses on the '28' phase, characterized by a knapping strategy based on Levallois and semi-prismatic laminar reduction systems and typified by the presence of end-scrapers. Luminescence chronology provides two sets of ages for the upper and lower Pietersburg of BRS, dated respectively to 73±6ka and 75±6ka on quartz and to 91±10ka and 97±10ka on feldspar, firmly positioning this industry within MIS5. Comparisons with other published lithic assemblages show technological differences between the Pietersburg from BRS and other southern African MIS5 traditions, especially those from the Western and Eastern Cape. We argue that, at least for part of MIS5, human populations in South Africa were regionally differentiated, a process that most likely impacted the way groups were territorially and socially organized. Nonetheless, comparisons between MIS5 assemblages also indicate some typological similarities, suggesting some degree of connection between human groups, which shared similar innovations but manipulated them in different ways. We pay particular attention to the end-scrapers from BRS, which represent thus far the earliest documented wide adoption of such tool-type and provide further evidence for the innovative processes characterizing southern Africa from the MIS5 onwards.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Archaeology / trends*
  • Culture
  • Fossils
  • Humans
  • Luminescence
  • Paleontology / trends*
  • Quartz
  • South Africa
  • Technology / trends*
  • Tool Use Behavior*

Substances

  • Quartz

Grants and funding

The excavation at Bushman Rock Shelter is funded by the French Ministry of Foreign Affairs (to GP) and initially benefited from a grant of the Fyssen Foundation (http://www.fondationfyssen.fr/en/)(to GP). The dating was supported by the Région Nouvelle Aquitaine through the “DAPRES_LA_FEM” project (to CT, NM). Geoarchaeological research was funded by a grant of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (MI 1748/1-1) (to CEM). AV and PDLP have a support from the DST/NRF Centre of Excellence in Palaeosciences (CoE in Palaeosciences). Supported was also provided by the Evolutionary Studies Institute (University of the Witwatersrand) and the French Institute of South Africa. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.